NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1746MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.02TB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
3744 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+5730%
13.41 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro FX
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1746 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1.02TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
60
12
SM Count
48
96
Shading Units
3840
24
TMUs
240
24
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.7 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.705 TFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
Vega 20
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
