Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1536GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 +1493%
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
2
192
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
192 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
21W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G86
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy