Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
4416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 +3430%
16.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
72
192
Shading Units
4608
64
TMUs
288
24
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
509.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.62 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.31 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
509.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
260W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy