Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA RTX A6000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA RTX A6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
10560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
RTX A6000 +8278%
38.71 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Oct 2020
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
84
192
Shading Units
10752
64
TMUs
336
24
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
201.6 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
604.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
38.71 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.71 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
604.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy