Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe

NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 540 and 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2004
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
885 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
250 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
231.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
10
-
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.24 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.339 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
4.339 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
135.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

NV43
GPU Name
GA107
NV43 GL
GPU Variant
-
Curie
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
110 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.146 billion
Transistors
Unknown
154 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
3.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy