Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16

NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 580 and 48GB VRAM Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 295W)
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
6112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 580
0.072 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 +85066%
61.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Apr 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
96
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
6144
16
TMUs
384
8
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
96
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
295W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G96C
GPU Name
Navi 31
G96-875-C1
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Tesla
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy