Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 vs NVIDIA A10G

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 vs NVIDIA A10G

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 and 12GB VRAM A10G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
8976 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 189W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 5800
0.622 TFLOPS
A10G +4967%
31.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1320 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
72
240
Shading Units
9216
80
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
164.2 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
492.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.52 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.52 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
985.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

189W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GA102
-
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy