Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (189W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
4880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 5800
0.622 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +2419%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1312 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
512bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
80
240
Shading Units
5120
80
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

189W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy