NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 2400W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
16336 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+45098%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
16384
16
TMUs
1024
8
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
2400W
-
Suggested PSU
2800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
100 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
