Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40m to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1124MHz vs 876MHz)
Lower TDP (45W vs 245W)
NVIDIA Tesla K40m 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1.151 TFLOPS
Tesla K40m +338%
5.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Nov 2013
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
745 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
2880
32
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
245W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK110B
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy