Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1792GB)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (51W vs 142W)
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000 +50%
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jun 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
384
Shading Units
256
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
142W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GF100
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy