Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1260MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
7040 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 Max Q +2452%
18.71 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
585 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1260 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
58
384
Shading Units
7424
32
TMUs
232
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.0 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
292.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.71 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.71 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
292.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GA103
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
22 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy