Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 51W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-III

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
-
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G71
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.278 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Board Design

51W
TDP
45W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy