NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550

VS

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages

Lower TDP (55W vs 600W)

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages

Released 10 years and 7 months late

Boost Clock1600MHz

More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

16000 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Quadro K2000M

0.572 TFLOPS

Data Center GPU Max 1550 +9066%

52.43 TFLOPS

Quadro K2000M

VS

Data Center GPU Max 1550

Graphics Card

Jun 2012

Release Date

Jan 2023

Quadro Mobile

Generation

Data Center GPU

Professional

Type

Professional

MXM-A (3.0)

Bus Interface

PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

900 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1600 MHz

900 MHz

Memory Clock

1600 MHz

Memory

2GB

Memory Size

128GB

DDR3

Memory Type

HBM2e

128bit

Memory Bus

8192bit

28.80GB/s

Bandwidth

3277GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

-

Compute Units

-

384

Shading Units

16384

32

TMUs

1024

16

ROPs

0

-

Tensor Cores

1024

-

RT Cores

128

16 KB (per SMX)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per EU)

256 KB

L2 Cache

408 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

0 MPixel/s

23.84 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

1638 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

52.43 TFLOPS

572.2 GFLOPS

FP32 (float)

52.43 TFLOPS

23.84 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

52.43 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107

GPU Name

Ponte Vecchio

N14P-Q3-A2

GPU Variant

-

Kepler

Architecture

Generation 12.5

TSMC

Foundry

Intel

28 nm

Process Size

10 nm

1.27 billion

Transistors

100 billion

118 mm²

Die Size

1280 mm²

Board Design

55W

TDP

600W

-

Suggested PSU

1000 W

No outputs

Outputs

No outputs

-

Power Connectors

-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.1

Vulkan

N/A

3.0

CUDA

-

5.1

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor

2

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

3

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile

4

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

5

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

6

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI8

7

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs AMD Instinct MI300A

8

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

9

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor

10

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA A10G

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD