NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
Lower TDP (51W vs 55W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
+28%
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GK107
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
