Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000M +101%
1.154 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K2000M
35
Quadro K4000M +177%
97
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
960
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.02 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.08 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1154 GFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.08 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GK104
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
N14E-Q3-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy