Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro K4100M +184%
1.627 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1152
32
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.94 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.78 GTexel/s
-
-
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.627 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.78 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GK104
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
N15E-Q3-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy