Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro 5010M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (55W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro 5010M +20%
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
12
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GF110
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
N12E-Q5
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy