Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1746MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1020GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI50 +2244%
13.41 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1746 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1020GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
60
384
Shading Units
3840
32
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.7 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.705 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Vega 20
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy