Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 DGXS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 300W)
NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Tesla P100 DGXS +1754%
10.61 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1328 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
384
Shading Units
3584
32
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
142.1 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
331.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.22 TFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.61 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.304 TFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GP100
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy