Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA L4

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA L4

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 24GB VRAM L4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 72W)
NVIDIA L4 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (300.1GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
7232 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
L4 +9191%
30.29 TFLOPS
VS
L4

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla Ada(Lxx)
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
795 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
300.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
60
192
Shading Units
7424
16
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
60
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
163.2 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
30.29 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
30.29 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
473.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
72W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
AD104
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
AD104-???-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy