Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M +1317%
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
192
Shading Units
8
16
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
12W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G98
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy