Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro K620M +164%
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GM108
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
Unknown
118 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy