Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
5952 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +5780%
19.17 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
20GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
160bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
280.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
192
Shading Units
6144
16
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
124.8 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
AD104
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy