Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1124MHz vs 1114MHz)
Lower TDP (68W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000 +375%
6.844 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
988 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
3072
40
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
213.9 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

68W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GM200
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy