Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
3520 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +2129%
16.79 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
576
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
DG2-512
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy