Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
5568 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T +1368%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
576
Shading Units
6144
48
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
350W
-
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy