Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M +327%
0.753 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
576
Shading Units
64
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
176.0 GFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
59W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G94
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
G94 GL-U
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy