Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 88.13GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1036MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Quadro M2200 Mobile +181%
2.122 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
695 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1036 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1377 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
88.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
576
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.15 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.30 GTexel/s
-
-
-
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.122 TFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
66.30 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM206
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy