Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1747MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Mobile +1087%
8.945 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1747 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
576
Shading Units
2560
48
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.8 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
279.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
139.8 GFLOPS
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.945 TFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
279.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GP104
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy