Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
18880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +21599%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
576
Shading Units
19456
48
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
750W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
MI300
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
146 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy