Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA RTX A5000

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA RTX A5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 24GB VRAM RTX A5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 230W)
NVIDIA RTX A5000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
7424 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
RTX A5000 +2461%
27.77 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1170 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
64
768
Shading Units
8192
64
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
64
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
162.7 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
433.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.77 TFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
27.77 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
433.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
230W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA102
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy