Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock784MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200 +94%
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK104
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy