Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Tesla M1060

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Tesla M1060

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 2GB VRAM Tesla M1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1104 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (108W vs 188W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200 +238%
2.107 TFLOPS
Tesla M1060
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
1344
Shading Units
240
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
188W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GT200B
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy