Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K510M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

NVIDIA Quadro K510M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K510M and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K510M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 295W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 19.20GB/s)
5952 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K510M
0.341 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7900 +17882%
61.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Apr 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
19.20GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
96
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
6144
16
TMUs
384
8
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
96
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.556 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
14.22 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
341.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
14.22 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
295W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK208
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy