NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+65%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro 4100
2.142 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
57.02GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
1344
192
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.32 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.26 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.142 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.26 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.5
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
