Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA RTX A6000

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA RTX A6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 133% (1800MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
8448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
RTX A6000 +989%
38.71 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K5200
293
RTX A6000 +1738%
5387
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Oct 2020
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
84
2304
Shading Units
10752
192
TMUs
336
48
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
201.6 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
604.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
38.71 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.71 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
604.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy