Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 4GB VRAM GRID K280Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K280Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
GRID K280Q +165%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
GK104
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.54 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy