Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
352 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M +978%
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
384
Shading Units
32
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

30W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
G84
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.289 billion
Unknown
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy