NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

VS

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages

Lower TDP (55W vs 450W)

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages

Released 7 years and 1 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 41% (1550MHz vs 1098MHz)

More VRAM (96GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)

13696 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Quadro M2000M

1.405 TFLOPS

Data Center GPU Max 1350 +3062%

44.44 TFLOPS

Quadro M2000M

VS

Data Center GPU Max 1350

Graphics Card

Dec 2015

Release Date

Jan 2023

Quadro Mobile

Generation

Data Center GPU

Professional

Type

Professional

MXM-A (3.0)

Bus Interface

PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz

Base Clock

750 MHz

1098 MHz

Boost Clock

1550 MHz

1253 MHz

Memory Clock

1200 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

96GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

HBM2e

128bit

Memory Bus

8192bit

80.19GB/s

Bandwidth

2458GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

-

Compute Units

-

640

Shading Units

14336

40

TMUs

896

16

ROPs

0

-

Tensor Cores

896

-

RT Cores

112

64 KB (per SMM)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per EU)

2 MB

L2 Cache

408 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

0 MPixel/s

43.92 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

1389 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

44.44 TFLOPS

1405 GFLOPS

FP32 (float)

44.44 TFLOPS

43.92 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

44.44 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107

GPU Name

Ponte Vecchio

N16P-Q3-A2

GPU Variant

-

Maxwell

Architecture

Generation 12.5

TSMC

Foundry

Intel

28 nm

Process Size

10 nm

1.87 billion

Transistors

100 billion

148 mm²

Die Size

1280 mm²

Board Design

55W

TDP

450W

-

Suggested PSU

850 W

No outputs

Outputs

No outputs

None

Power Connectors

-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

N/A

5.0

CUDA

-

5.1

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104

2

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile

3

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4

4

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

5

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

6

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

7

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

8

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla K40t

9

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16

10

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

Related News

1

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

2

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

3

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

4

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

5

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

6

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

7

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

8

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

9

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

10

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance