Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1124MHz vs 1098MHz)
Lower TDP (45W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M +22%
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro K1200
1.151 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro M2000M +3%
136
Quadro K1200
131
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Jan 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1058 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
512
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.97 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1151 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.97 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GM107
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GM107-860-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy