Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared a Professional market GPU: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and a Mobile platform GPU: 4GB VRAM RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 84% (2025MHz vs 1098MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation +490%
8.294 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Feb 2024
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Professional
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
2025 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
640
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.80 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.294 TFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.294 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
AD107
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy