NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
+7313%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
21W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
G86
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
