Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P620

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1354MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M +55%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro P620
1.386 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1266 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1354 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1252 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
1024
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.66 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.33 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.66 GFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1386 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.33 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
40W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GP107
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy