NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 110W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
+341%
9.492 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M3000M
2016
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
+353%
9149
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
1024
Shading Units
3072
64
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.98 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.492 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
296.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
110W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
TU104B
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
