NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
512 additional rendering cores
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1950MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000M
2.995 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+33%
3.994 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
1024
96
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
93.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
2.995 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
93.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
DG2-128
N16E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
