Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M520 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M520 Mobile
0.8 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090 +66%
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
40.10GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.328 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
16.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
799.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
24.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy