Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro M6000 24 GB and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000 24 GB +6813%
6.844 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Oct 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
-
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
3072
Shading Units
32
256
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
285.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
G96
GM200-880-A1
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy