Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 130M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 55W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
376 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 130M
0.013 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M +4300%
0.572 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
12.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GK107
G86-613-A2
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy