Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs AMD Instinct MI300A

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs AMD Instinct MI300A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
14584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300A +532943%
122.6 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Dec 2023
NVS Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
228
8
Shading Units
14592
4
TMUs
880
4
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
MI300
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
146 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Board Design

12W
TDP
760W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy